Data

CERF - Responses by stakeholders to fisheries management alternatives

Australian Ocean Data Network
CSIRO O&A, Information & Data Centre (Point of contact) Wilcox, Chris (Point of contact)
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=https://marlin.csiro.au/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/bc1b3741-e7dc-5039-e044-00144f7bc0f4&rft.title=CERF - Responses by stakeholders to fisheries management alternatives&rft.identifier=Anzlic Identifier: ANZCW0306008819&rft.publisher=Australian Ocean Data Network&rft.description=Fisheries management is increasingly involving a wide range of stakeholders in the decision making process. An implicit assumption in these management structures is that stakeholder representatives present a unified view, and that these views combine to derive optimal management decisions that best satisfy all stakeholders. In this paper, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used to determine the objective preference structure of stakeholder representatives involved in Australian Commonwealth fisheries management. The results indicate that there is generally low coherence within stakeholder groups, suggesting that management decision making is a function more of the set of individuals than the stakeholder groups they represent. The stakeholders represented were from policy and management, science, industry, environment, economics, social science and recreation.Progress Code: completedMaintenance and Update Frequency: notPlannedStatement: Survey weightings from ETBF participants&rft.creator=Anonymous&rft.date=2011&rft.coverage=westlimit=-180; southlimit=-85; eastlimit=-180; northlimit=0&rft.coverage=westlimit=-180; southlimit=-85; eastlimit=-180; northlimit=0&rft_rights=No Restrictions&rft_subject=society&rft_subject=Countries | Australia&rft_subject=Global / Oceans | South West Pacific Ocean&rft_subject=Global / Oceans | Southern Ocean&rft_subject=Commonwealth Environment Research Facilities&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data
Cite Saved to MyRDA Save to MyRDA

Licence & Rights:

view details

No Restrictions

Access:

Other

Contact Information



Brief description

Fisheries management is increasingly involving a wide range of stakeholders in the decision making process. An implicit assumption in these management structures is that stakeholder representatives present a unified view, and that these views combine to derive optimal management decisions that best satisfy all stakeholders. In this paper, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used to determine the objective preference structure of stakeholder representatives involved in Australian Commonwealth fisheries management. The results indicate that there is generally low coherence within stakeholder groups, suggesting that management decision making is a function more of the set of individuals than the stakeholder groups they represent. The stakeholders represented were from policy and management, science, industry, environment, economics, social science and recreation.

Lineage

Progress Code: completed
Maintenance and Update Frequency: notPlanned
Statement: Survey weightings from ETBF participants

Notes

Credit
CERF Biodiversity Hub
Credit
Wendy Proctor
Credit
Sean Pascoe

Data time period: 2008-11-01 to 2009-02-27

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph
Help

Related Organisations

Related People

Related Services

-180,-85

-180,-42.5

text: westlimit=-180; southlimit=-85; eastlimit=-180; northlimit=0

Subjects
Commonwealth Environment Research Facilities | Countries | Australia | Global / Oceans | South West Pacific Ocean | Global / Oceans | Southern Ocean | society |

User Contributed Tags    

Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover

Other Information
Identifiers
  • Local : Anzlic Identifier: ANZCW0306008819
  • Local : Marlin Record Number: 8819
  • global : bc1b3741-e7dc-5039-e044-00144f7bc0f4
Similar data you may be interested in: