Data

Associated data for Qualitative Think-aloud

Central Queensland University
Kristie-Lee Alfrey (Aggregated by)
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.25946/28852571.v1&rft.title=Associated data for Qualitative Think-aloud&rft.identifier=10.25946/28852571.v1&rft.publisher=Central Queensland University&rft.description=Identity – a person’s lifelong culmination of social experiences and internalised values and ideals – is considered valuable to understanding behaviour. However, there is ambiguity amongst behavioural science surrounding whether identity and its influence on behaviour is experienced consciously (reflectively) or non-consciously (automatically). The present study explores participants’ cognitive accessibility and perceptions of identity, and whether and/or how identity drives their behaviour. Methods: This study employed a qualitative retrospective think-aloud approach. Participants (N=15; M age=39.2 years; 60% female) completed an online survey, providing informed consent, demographic details, and responses to identity-related questions for cognitive guidance pre-interview. Participants then completed an online semi-structured interview, exploring perceptions of identity and cognitive accessibility to its influence on their behaviour. Results: Real-world perceptions of identity encompassed social and personal values, beliefs and roles which non-consciously evolved throughout life experiences. However, depending on context, identity was perceived to have both non-conscious and conscious influences on behaviour. Conclusion: This study highlights the identity-behaviour relationship as primarily a non-conscious process, subsequently suggesting that participants may experience some difficulty in self-reporting identity-related behaviours. To mitigate this concern, future research may consider adoption of implicit measures and methodologies specifically designed to address lesser cognitively accessible constructs.&rft.creator=Kristie-Lee Alfrey&rft.date=2025&rft_rights= https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en&rft_subject=Social psychology&rft_subject=Learning, motivation and emotion&rft_subject=Mental health services&rft_subject=Health promotion&rft_subject=Health psychology&rft_subject=Higher education&rft_subject=Identity Theory&rft_subject=Behaviour change&rft_subject=Behavioural Cognition&rft_subject=Dual Process&rft_subject=Ecological Validity&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Other view details

Full description

Identity – a person’s lifelong culmination of social experiences and internalised values and ideals – is considered valuable to understanding behaviour. However, there is ambiguity amongst behavioural science surrounding whether identity and its influence on behaviour is experienced consciously (reflectively) or non-consciously (automatically). The present study explores participants’ cognitive accessibility and perceptions of identity, and whether and/or how identity drives their behaviour.

Methods: This study employed a qualitative retrospective think-aloud approach. Participants (N=15; M age=39.2 years; 60% female) completed an online survey, providing informed consent, demographic details, and responses to identity-related questions for cognitive guidance pre-interview. Participants then completed an online semi-structured interview, exploring perceptions of identity and cognitive accessibility to its influence on their behaviour.

Results: Real-world perceptions of identity encompassed social and personal values, beliefs and roles which non-consciously evolved throughout life experiences. However, depending on context, identity was perceived to have both non-conscious and conscious influences on behaviour.

Conclusion: This study highlights the identity-behaviour relationship as primarily a non-conscious process, subsequently suggesting that participants may experience some difficulty in self-reporting identity-related behaviours. To mitigate this concern, future research may consider adoption of implicit measures and methodologies specifically designed to address lesser cognitively accessible constructs.

Data time period: 2022-01-30 to 2022-02-28

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph
Subjects

User Contributed Tags    

Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover

Identifiers
ACN 633 798 857