Data

Aquaculture suitability data of the Victoria catchment NT generated by the Victoria River Water Resource Assessment

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Watson, Ian ; Thomas, Mark ; Philip, Seonaid ; Stockmann, Uta ; Searle, Ross ; Gregory, Linda ; hill, jason ; Wilson, Peter R ; Wilson, Peter
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.25919/229b-5f96&rft.title=Aquaculture suitability data of the Victoria catchment NT generated by the Victoria River Water Resource Assessment&rft.identifier=https://doi.org/10.25919/229b-5f96&rft.publisher=Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation&rft.description=These aquaculture suitability raster datasets (GeoTIFF format) indicate areas of potential suitability for freshwater and marine aquaculture species in earthen or lined ponds. A multi-criteria analysis, involved the integration of soil data and biophysical characteristics within a GIS spatial analysis environment to predict potential sites to inform decision making. A set of limitations and rules were adapted from (McLeod et al., 2002) to determine suitability. These aquaculture datasets were generated within the ‘Land suitability’ activity in consultation with the agricultural viability activity of the Victoria River Water Resource Assessment (VIWRA). The aquaculture suitability analysis is described in the CSIRO VIWRA published report ' Soils and land suitability for the Victoria catchment, Northern Territory’. A technical report from the CSIRO Victoria River Water Resource Assessment to the Government of Australia. There are five suitability classes coded 1-5. 1 – Highly suitable land with negligible limitations 2 – Suitable land with minor limitations 3 – Moderately suitable land with considerable limitations 4 – Currently unsuitable land with severe limitations and 5 – Unsuitable land with extreme limitations. Each drop in suitability implies that more management input (and cost) is required to achieve incremental increases in production. The soil and land characteristics considered for all configurations include; clay content, sodicity and rockiness; and mainly refer to geotechnical considerations (e.g. construction and stability of pond walls). Other limitations, including slope, and the likely presence of gilgai microrelief and acid sulfate soils, infer more difficult, expensive and therefore less suitable development environments, and a greater degree of land preparation effort. Key considerations for earthen ponds included soil properties preventing pond leakage and soil acidity (pH); the latter taking into account negative growth responses of species from unfavourable pH values (i.e. biological limitation) as well as engineering, as pH may affect the structural integrity of earthen walls. Proximity to sea water was considered for marine species although the characteristics of tides and their suitability for marine aquaculture have not been applied in this analysis therefore the full inland distance of tidal waters has not been explored. The aquaculture suitability rules, including the limitation classes and suitability subclasses for each species by pond configuration, is provided in the above referenced publication. It is important to emphasize that this is a regional-scale assessment: further data collection and detailed soil physical, chemical and nutrient analyses would be required to plan development at a scheme, enterprise or property scale. Several limitations that may have a bearing on aquaculture suitability were out of scope and not assessed as part of this activity (refer to the report), these limitations include biophysical and socio-cultural. For example these land suitability raster datasets do not include consideration of the licensing of water, flood risk, risk of irrigation or land tenure and other legislative controls. Some of these may be addressed elsewhere in VIWRA eg flooding was investigated by the Earth observation remote sensing group in the surface water activity. The Victoria River Water Resource Assessment provides a comprehensive overview and integrated evaluation of the feasibility of aquaculture and agriculture development in the Victoria catchment NT as well as the ecological, social and cultural (indigenous water values, rights and aspirations) impacts of development.Lineage: These aquaculture raster datasets have been generated from a range of inputs and processing steps. Following is an overview. For more information refer to the CSIRO VIWRA published report ' Soils and land suitability for the Victoria catchment, Northern Territory’. A technical report from the CSIRO Victoria River Water Resource Assessment to the Government of Australia. 1. Collated existing data. 2. Selection of additional soil and land attribute site data locations by a conditioned Latin hypercube statistical sampling method applied across the covariate data space. 3. Fieldwork was carried out to collect new attribute data, soil samples for analysis and build an understanding of geomorphology and landscape processes. 4. Database analysis was performed to extract the data to specific selection criteria required for the attribute to be modelled. 5. The R statistical programming environment was used for the attribute computing. Models were built from selected input data and covariate data. 6. Create Digital Soil Mapping (DSM) attribute raster datasets. DSM data is a geo-referenced dataset, generated from field observations and laboratory data, coupled with environmental covariate data through quantitative relationships. It applies pedometrics - the use of mathematical and statistical models that combine information from soil observations with information contained in correlated environmental variables, remote sensing images and some geophysical measurements. 7. Aquaculture suitability rules created for DSM attributes. 8. Suitability rules were run to produce limitation subclass datasets. 9. Final suitability data created for aquaculture options. 10. QA Quality assessment of these land suitability data was conducted by two methods. Method 1: Statistical (quantitative) assessment of the reliability of the spatial output data presented as a raster of the Confusion Index. Method 2: Collecting independent external validation site data combined with on-ground expert (qualitative) examination of outputs during validation field trips. A two-week validation field trip was conducted by on-ground and expert (qualitative) examination of outputs. These results are published in the report referenced above.&rft.creator=Watson, Ian &rft.creator=Thomas, Mark &rft.creator=Philip, Seonaid &rft.creator=Stockmann, Uta &rft.creator=Searle, Ross &rft.creator=Gregory, Linda &rft.creator=hill, jason &rft.creator=Wilson, Peter R &rft.creator=Wilson, Peter &rft.date=2024&rft.edition=v1&rft.coverage=westlimit=129.08708305555555; southlimit=-18.33486; eastlimit=132.30791000000002; northlimit=-14.85697; projection=WGS84&rft_rights=Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/&rft_rights=Data is accessible online and may be reused in accordance with licence conditions&rft_rights=All Rights (including copyright) CSIRO 2024.&rft_subject=VIWRA&rft_subject=SOGWRA&rft_subject=ROWRA&rft_subject=NAWRA&rft_subject=FGARA&rft_subject=Agriculture&rft_subject=Water&rft_subject=Soil&rft_subject=Irrigation&rft_subject=Digital Soil Mapping&rft_subject=Land suitability&rft_subject=Northern Australia&rft_subject=Cropping&rft_subject=Victoria catchment (NT)&rft_subject=Aquaculture&rft_subject=Agricultural spatial analysis and modelling&rft_subject=Agriculture, land and farm management&rft_subject=AGRICULTURAL, VETERINARY AND FOOD SCIENCES&rft_subject=Sustainable agricultural development&rft_subject=Aquaculture&rft_subject=Fisheries sciences&rft_subject=Land capability and soil productivity&rft_subject=Soil sciences&rft_subject=ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES&rft_subject=Soil sciences not elsewhere classified&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details
CC-BY

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Data is accessible online and may be reused in accordance with licence conditions

All Rights (including copyright) CSIRO 2024.

Access:

Open view details

Accessible for free

Contact Information



Full description

These aquaculture suitability raster datasets (GeoTIFF format) indicate areas of potential suitability for freshwater and marine aquaculture species in earthen or lined ponds. A multi-criteria analysis, involved the integration of soil data and biophysical characteristics within a GIS spatial analysis environment to predict potential sites to inform decision making. A set of limitations and rules were adapted from (McLeod et al., 2002) to determine suitability. These aquaculture datasets were generated within the ‘Land suitability’ activity in consultation with the agricultural viability activity of the Victoria River Water Resource Assessment (VIWRA). The aquaculture suitability analysis is described in the CSIRO VIWRA published report ' Soils and land suitability for the Victoria catchment, Northern Territory’. A technical report from the CSIRO Victoria River Water Resource Assessment to the Government of Australia. There are five suitability classes coded 1-5. 1 – Highly suitable land with negligible limitations 2 – Suitable land with minor limitations 3 – Moderately suitable land with considerable limitations 4 – Currently unsuitable land with severe limitations and 5 – Unsuitable land with extreme limitations. Each drop in suitability implies that more management input (and cost) is required to achieve incremental increases in production. The soil and land characteristics considered for all configurations include; clay content, sodicity and rockiness; and mainly refer to geotechnical considerations (e.g. construction and stability of pond walls). Other limitations, including slope, and the likely presence of gilgai microrelief and acid sulfate soils, infer more difficult, expensive and therefore less suitable development environments, and a greater degree of land preparation effort. Key considerations for earthen ponds included soil properties preventing pond leakage and soil acidity (pH); the latter taking into account negative growth responses of species from unfavourable pH values (i.e. biological limitation) as well as engineering, as pH may affect the structural integrity of earthen walls. Proximity to sea water was considered for marine species although the characteristics of tides and their suitability for marine aquaculture have not been applied in this analysis therefore the full inland distance of tidal waters has not been explored. The aquaculture suitability rules, including the limitation classes and suitability subclasses for each species by pond configuration, is provided in the above referenced publication. It is important to emphasize that this is a regional-scale assessment: further data collection and detailed soil physical, chemical and nutrient analyses would be required to plan development at a scheme, enterprise or property scale. Several limitations that may have a bearing on aquaculture suitability were out of scope and not assessed as part of this activity (refer to the report), these limitations include biophysical and socio-cultural. For example these land suitability raster datasets do not include consideration of the licensing of water, flood risk, risk of irrigation or land tenure and other legislative controls. Some of these may be addressed elsewhere in VIWRA eg flooding was investigated by the Earth observation remote sensing group in the surface water activity. The Victoria River Water Resource Assessment provides a comprehensive overview and integrated evaluation of the feasibility of aquaculture and agriculture development in the Victoria catchment NT as well as the ecological, social and cultural (indigenous water values, rights and aspirations) impacts of development.
Lineage: These aquaculture raster datasets have been generated from a range of inputs and processing steps. Following is an overview. For more information refer to the CSIRO VIWRA published report ' Soils and land suitability for the Victoria catchment, Northern Territory’. A technical report from the CSIRO Victoria River Water Resource Assessment to the Government of Australia. 1. Collated existing data. 2. Selection of additional soil and land attribute site data locations by a conditioned Latin hypercube statistical sampling method applied across the covariate data space. 3. Fieldwork was carried out to collect new attribute data, soil samples for analysis and build an understanding of geomorphology and landscape processes. 4. Database analysis was performed to extract the data to specific selection criteria required for the attribute to be modelled. 5. The R statistical programming environment was used for the attribute computing. Models were built from selected input data and covariate data. 6. Create Digital Soil Mapping (DSM) attribute raster datasets. DSM data is a geo-referenced dataset, generated from field observations and laboratory data, coupled with environmental covariate data through quantitative relationships. It applies pedometrics - the use of mathematical and statistical models that combine information from soil observations with information contained in correlated environmental variables, remote sensing images and some geophysical measurements. 7. Aquaculture suitability rules created for DSM attributes. 8. Suitability rules were run to produce limitation subclass datasets. 9. Final suitability data created for aquaculture options. 10. QA Quality assessment of these land suitability data was conducted by two methods. Method 1: Statistical (quantitative) assessment of the "reliability" of the spatial output data presented as a raster of the Confusion Index. Method 2: Collecting independent external validation site data combined with on-ground expert (qualitative) examination of outputs during validation field trips. A two-week validation field trip was conducted by on-ground and expert (qualitative) examination of outputs. These results are published in the report referenced above.

Available: 2024-12-13

Data time period: 2021-07-01 to 2024-09-30

This dataset is part of a larger collection

132.30791,-14.85697 132.30791,-18.33486 129.08708,-18.33486 129.08708,-14.85697 132.30791,-14.85697

130.69749652778,-16.595915

ACN 633 798 857