Full description
The pragmatic research design included the collection of data across three phases over an entire school year from a study sample comprising 4 teachers, 128 students and the insider researcher. While the quantitative tool in the form of a student engagement survey showed no significant change in student engagement, the qualitative data tools including student and teacher surveys; student drawings; researcher memos; and artefacts, surfaced improvements in student engagement.Notes
Funding SourceAustralian Government Research Training Program Scholarship New South Wales Department of Education School Leadership Institute
Issued: 2024-09-20
Subjects
160303 Teacher and instructor development |
Curriculum and Pedagogy |
Curriculum and Pedagogy Theory and Development |
Education |
User Contributed Tags
Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover
Other Information
handle :
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/64488
Identifiers
- DOI : 10.25952/7B17-0123
- Handle : 1959.11/63141
- Local : une:1959.11/63141