Data

Testing absolute plate reference frames

The University of Sydney
Dietmar Muller (Aggregated by)
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.4227/11/5587A89122CF5&rft.title=Testing absolute plate reference frames&rft.identifier=http://dx.doi.org/10.4227/11/5587A89122CF5&rft.publisher=The University of Sydney&rft.description=This data collection is associated with the publication: Shephard, G. E., Bunge, H. P., Schuberth, B. S., Müller, R. D., Talsma, A. S., Moder, C., & Landgrebe, T. C. W. (2012). Testing absolute plate reference frames and the implications for the generation of geodynamic mantle heterogeneity structure. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 317, 204-217. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.11.027 Publication Abstract Absolute reference frames are a means of describing the motion of plates on the surface of the Earth over time, relative to a fixed point or “frame”. Multiple models of absolute plate motion have been proposed for the Cretaceous–Tertiary period, however, estimating the robustness and limitations of each model remains a significant limitation for refining both regional and global models of plate motion as well as fully integrated and time dependent geodynamic models. Here, we use a novel approach to compare five models of absolute plate motion in terms of their consequences for forward modelled deep mantle structure since at least 140 Ma. We show that the use of hotspots, either fixed or moving, or palaeomagnetics, with or without corrections for true-polar wander, leads to significant differences in palaeo-plate velocities of over 10 cm/yr as well as differences in the location of palaeo-plate boundaries of up to 30° in longitude and latitude. Furthermore, we suggest that first order differences in forward predicted mantle structure between the models are due mostly to differences in palaeo-plate velocities, whereas variation in the location of plate boundaries may contribute to smaller wavelength offsets. We present a global comparison of the absolute reference frames in terms of mantle structure, which we have tomographically filtered to reflect the resolution of the seismic tomography model S20RTS. At very long wavelengths hotspot models best reproduce the mantle structure. However, when geometry and the match of smaller-scale subducted slab volumes are compared, a hybrid model based on moving hotspots after 100 Ma and palaeomagnetic data before (with no corrections for true-polar wander), best reproduces the overall mantle structure of slab burial grounds, even though no single model fits best at all mantle depths. We find also that the published subduction reference frame tested here results in a modelled mantle structure that agrees well with S20RTS for depths > 2500 km, equivalent to subduction before the Cretaceous, but not for shallower depths. This indicates that a careful assimilation of hotspot, palaeomagnetic and seismic tomography data into future absolute plate motion models is required to derive a more robust subduction reference frame. Authors and Institutions Grace E. Shephard - EarthByte Research Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, Australia. ORCID: 0000-0002-3459-4500 Hans-Peter Bunge - Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany Bernhard S. A. Schuberth - UMR GéoAzur, Univeristé de Nice, France R. Dietmar Müller - EarthByte Research Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, Australia. ORCID: 0000-0002-3334-5764 Aedon Talsma - EarthByte Research Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, Australia Christoph Moder - Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany Thomas Landgrebe - EarthByte Research Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, Australia Overview of Resources Contained This data collection includes both the Euler rotations and plate polygons for each of the 5 absolute reference frames that were tested in the publication. List of Resources Note: For details on the files included in this data collection, see “Description_of_Resources.txt”. Note: For information on file formats and what programs to use to interact with various file formats, see “File_Formats_and_Recommended_Programs.txt”. Hybrid hotspot model (.gpml, .rot, total 37.3 MB) Fixed hotspot model (.gpml, .rot, total 37.1 MB) Hybrid hotspot and palaeomagnetic model (.gpml, .rot, total 36.1 MB) Subduction reference frame model (.gpml, .rot, total 36.3 MB) Hybrid hotspot and TPW-corrected palaeomagnetic model (.gpml, .rot, total 37.1 MB) For more information on this data collection, and links to other datasets from the EarthByte Research Group please visit EarthByte For more information about using GPlates, including tutorials and a user manual please visit GPlates or EarthByte&rft.creator=Dietmar Muller&rft.date=2015&rft.relation=10.1016/j.epsl.2011.11.027&rft.coverage=Global&rft_rights=CC BY: Attribution 3.0 AU http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au&rft_subject=absolute plate motion&rft_subject=true polar wander&rft_subject=rotation file&rft_subject=Cretaceous&rft_subject=Cenozoic&rft_subject=seismic tomography&rft_subject=plate boundaries&rft_subject=geodynamic modelling&rft_subject=global&rft_subject=GPlates&rft_subject=hotspots&rft_subject=plate motion model&rft_subject=plate tectonics&rft_subject=reconstruction&rft_subject=subduction&rft_subject=Tectonics&rft_subject=EARTH SCIENCES&rft_subject=GEOLOGY&rft_subject=Geodynamics&rft_subject=GEOPHYSICS&rft_subject=Expanding Knowledge in the Earth Sciences&rft_subject=EXPANDING KNOWLEDGE&rft_subject=EXPANDING KNOWLEDGE&rft_subject=Pure basic research&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Other view details
Unknown

CC BY: Attribution 3.0 AU
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au

Access:

Other view details

Open Access

Full description

This data collection is associated with the publication: Shephard, G. E., Bunge, H. P., Schuberth, B. S., Müller, R. D., Talsma, A. S., Moder, C., & Landgrebe, T. C. W. (2012). Testing absolute plate reference frames and the implications for the generation of geodynamic mantle heterogeneity structure. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 317, 204-217. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.11.027

Publication Abstract

Absolute reference frames are a means of describing the motion of plates on the surface of the Earth over time, relative to a fixed point or “frame”. Multiple models of absolute plate motion have been proposed for the Cretaceous–Tertiary period, however, estimating the robustness and limitations of each model remains a significant limitation for refining both regional and global models of plate motion as well as fully integrated and time dependent geodynamic models. Here, we use a novel approach to compare five models of absolute plate motion in terms of their consequences for forward modelled deep mantle structure since at least 140 Ma. We show that the use of hotspots, either fixed or moving, or palaeomagnetics, with or without corrections for true-polar wander, leads to significant differences in palaeo-plate velocities of over 10 cm/yr as well as differences in the location of palaeo-plate boundaries of up to 30° in longitude and latitude. Furthermore, we suggest that first order differences in forward predicted mantle structure between the models are due mostly to differences in palaeo-plate velocities, whereas variation in the location of plate boundaries may contribute to smaller wavelength offsets. We present a global comparison of the absolute reference frames in terms of mantle structure, which we have tomographically filtered to reflect the resolution of the seismic tomography model S20RTS. At very long wavelengths hotspot models best reproduce the mantle structure. However, when geometry and the match of smaller-scale subducted slab volumes are compared, a hybrid model based on moving hotspots after 100 Ma and palaeomagnetic data before (with no corrections for true-polar wander), best reproduces the overall mantle structure of slab burial grounds, even though no single model fits best at all mantle depths. We find also that the published subduction reference frame tested here results in a modelled mantle structure that agrees well with S20RTS for depths > 2500 km, equivalent to subduction before the Cretaceous, but not for shallower depths. This indicates that a careful assimilation of hotspot, palaeomagnetic and seismic tomography data into future absolute plate motion models is required to derive a more robust subduction reference frame.

Authors and Institutions

Grace E. Shephard - EarthByte Research Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, Australia. ORCID: 0000-0002-3459-4500

Hans-Peter Bunge - Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany

Bernhard S. A. Schuberth - UMR GéoAzur, Univeristé de Nice, France

R. Dietmar Müller - EarthByte Research Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, Australia. ORCID: 0000-0002-3334-5764

Aedon Talsma - EarthByte Research Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, Australia

Christoph Moder - Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany

Thomas Landgrebe - EarthByte Research Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, Australia

Overview of Resources Contained

This data collection includes both the Euler rotations and plate polygons for each of the 5 absolute reference frames that were tested in the publication.

List of Resources

Note: For details on the files included in this data collection, see “Description_of_Resources.txt”.

Note: For information on file formats and what programs to use to interact with various file formats, see “File_Formats_and_Recommended_Programs.txt”.

  • Hybrid hotspot model (.gpml, .rot, total 37.3 MB)
  • Fixed hotspot model (.gpml, .rot, total 37.1 MB)
  • Hybrid hotspot and palaeomagnetic model (.gpml, .rot, total 36.1 MB)
  • Subduction reference frame model (.gpml, .rot, total 36.3 MB)
  • Hybrid hotspot and TPW-corrected palaeomagnetic model (.gpml, .rot, total 37.1 MB)

For more information on this data collection, and links to other datasets from the EarthByte Research Group please visit EarthByte

For more information about using GPlates, including tutorials and a user manual please visit GPlates or EarthByte

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Spatial Coverage And Location

text: Global