Data

Publications used to review the relative effectiveness of different methods for sampling bees in "The relative performance of sampling methods for native bees: an empirical test and review of the literature"

Curtin University
Kingsley Dixon (Aggregated by) Kit Prendergast (Associated with, Aggregated by) Myles H.M. Menz (Aggregated by) Philip Bateman (Aggregated by)
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.25917/5ee848123cdae&rft.title=Publications used to review the relative effectiveness of different methods for sampling bees in "The relative performance of sampling methods for native bees: an empirical test and review of the literature"&rft.identifier=10.25917/5ee848123cdae&rft.publisher=Curtin University&rft.description=A review by Kit S. Prendergast was conducted to identify articles that compare sampling methods, or were surveys of bee communities that included two or more sampling methodologies. Articles were sourced through Google Scholar using the search terms “sampling bees method* technique pan bowl trap* sweep net* pollinator bait vane” and through references in the articles thus found. Articles included were those published prior to 28 November 2019.&rft.creator=Kingsley Dixon&rft.creator=Kit Prendergast&rft.creator=Myles H.M. Menz&rft.creator=Philip Bateman&rft.date=2020&rft.relation=http://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3076&rft_rights=Free for re-use under a CC BY: Attribution 4.0 licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/&rft_rights=CC BY: Attribution 4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/&rft_subject=sampling&rft_subject=monitoring&rft_subject=methods&rft_subject=literature review&rft_subject=bees&rft_subject=entomology&rft_subject=techniques&rft_subject=sweep netting&rft_subject=pan traps&rft_subject=biodiversity&rft_subject=Ecosystem Function&rft_subject=ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES&rft_subject=ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS&rft_subject=Conservation and Biodiversity&rft_subject=ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT&rft_subject=Environmental Impact Assessment&rft_subject=Environmental Management&rft_subject=Environmental Monitoring&rft_subject=Wildlife and Habitat Management&rft_subject=Community Ecology&rft_subject=BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES&rft_subject=ECOLOGY&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data
Cite Saved to MyRDA Save to MyRDA

Licence & Rights:

Other view details
Unknown

CC BY: Attribution 4.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Free for re-use under a CC BY: Attribution 4.0 licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Access:

Open view details

Full description

A review by Kit S. Prendergast was conducted to identify articles that compare sampling methods, or were surveys of bee communities that included two or more sampling methodologies. Articles were sourced through Google Scholar using the search terms “sampling bees method* technique pan bowl trap* sweep net* pollinator bait vane” and through references in the articles thus found. Articles included were those published prior to 28 November 2019.

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph
Help

Related Publications

Related Organisations

Related People

Subjects
Biological Sciences | Community Ecology | Conservation and Biodiversity | Ecological Applications | Ecology | Environmental Science and Management | Environmental Sciences | Ecosystem Function | Environmental Impact Assessment | Environmental Management | Environmental Monitoring | Wildlife and Habitat Management | bees | biodiversity | entomology | literature review | methods | monitoring | pan traps | sampling | sweep netting | techniques |

User Contributed Tags    

Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover

Identifiers
Similar data you may be interested in: