Data

Dugong aerial survey (cetacean, dugong and turtle) Northern Great Barrier Reef, 1990 November to December

James Cook University
Grech, A ; Marsh, H ; Lawler, I ; Kwan, D
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=https://research.jcu.edu.au/data/published/1423b384b48d5c9e94cdffc095a96f6b&rft.title=Dugong aerial survey (cetacean, dugong and turtle) Northern Great Barrier Reef, 1990 November to December&rft.identifier=https://research.jcu.edu.au/data/published/1423b384b48d5c9e94cdffc095a96f6b&rft.publisher=James Cook University&rft.description=In November-December 1990, dugongs, sea turtles and cetaceans were counted from the air at an overall sampling intensity of 9% over a total area of 31288 km2 in the Great Barrier Reef region north of Cooktown. This survey was a repetition of the surveys conducted in 1984 and 1985. The population estimates for dugongs and sea turtles were corrected for perception bias (the proportion of animals visible in the transect which are missed by observers), and standardised for availability bias (the proportion of animals that are invisible due to water turbidity) with survey and species-specific correction factors. The estimates for cetaceans were corrected for perception bias only. The minimum population estimate for dugongs for the survey area in November-December 1990 (10471± s.e. 1578 dugongs), was not significantly different from the estimate for the same region in November 1985 using the same aerial survey technique (8110 ± s.e. 1073). The results of the two surveys for each survey block were remarkably consistent suggesting that the dugong population in the region is stable. However, the technique is not capable of detecting local declines in abundance unless they were considerable. Most of the turtles sighted during this survey were probably large green turtles. The population estimate for the northern Great Barrier Reef region in November-December 1990 was 45644 ± s.e. 3501 turtles compared with 32187 ± 2532 for the same region in November 1985. This difference between surveys was not significant when sighting conditions were taken into account. However, the agreement between the 1985 and 1990 surveys was not nearly as good for turtles as for dugongs, probably due to: (1) the sensitivity of turtle sightings to small changes in sighting conditions which cannot be completely removed in the analyses and (2) the tendency of turtles to migrate to breed coincident with the timing of the surveys. All the cetaceans sighted were dolphins. Most of the animals appeared to be bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncates, or Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins, Sousa chinensis. The population estimates for November-December 1990 sum to 4875 ± s.e. 500 dolphins for the whole region compared with 6609 ± 667 in November 1985. The difference in dolphin distribution was significantly different between the two surveys.Sighting for dugongs, cetaceans and turtles in the Northern Great Barrier Reef area during the dugong aerials surveys between November and December 1990.&rft.creator=Grech, A &rft.creator=Marsh, H &rft.creator=Lawler, I &rft.creator=Kwan, D &rft.date=2011&rft.coverage=142.8859,-11.5 145.5632,-11.5 145.5632,-15.1252 142.8859,-15.1252 142.8859,-11.5&rft.coverage=Northern Great Barrier Reef&rft_rights=&rft_subject=dugong dugon&rft_subject=abundance&rft_subject=distribution&rft_subject=Northern Great Barrier Reef&rft_subject=marine biology&rft_subject=cetacean&rft_subject=marine mammal&rft_subject=Great Barrier Reef&rft_subject=dolphin&rft_subject=turtle&rft_subject=aerial surveys&rft_subject=dugong&rft_subject=ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies&rft_subject=Conservation and Biodiversity&rft_subject=ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES&rft_subject=ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT&rft_subject=Environmental Monitoring&rft_subject=Coastal and Estuarine Water Management&rft_subject=ENVIRONMENT&rft_subject=LAND AND WATER MANAGEMENT&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Access:

Open view details

Open: free access under license

Brief description

Sighting for dugongs, cetaceans and turtles in the Northern Great Barrier Reef area during the dugong aerials surveys between November and December 1990.

Full description

In November-December 1990, dugongs, sea turtles and cetaceans were counted from the air at an overall sampling intensity of 9% over a total area of 31288 km2 in the Great Barrier Reef region north of Cooktown. This survey was a repetition of the surveys conducted in 1984 and 1985. The population estimates for dugongs and sea turtles were corrected for perception bias (the proportion of animals visible in the transect which are missed by observers), and standardised for availability bias (the proportion of animals that are invisible due to water turbidity) with survey and species-specific correction factors. The estimates for cetaceans were corrected for perception bias only. The minimum population estimate for dugongs for the survey area in November-December 1990 (10471± s.e. 1578 dugongs), was not significantly different from the estimate for the same region in November 1985 using the same aerial survey technique (8110 ± s.e. 1073). The results of the two surveys for each survey block were remarkably consistent suggesting that the dugong population in the region is stable. However, the technique is not capable of detecting local declines in abundance unless they were considerable. Most of the turtles sighted during this survey were probably large green turtles. The population estimate for the northern Great Barrier Reef region in November-December 1990 was 45644 ± s.e. 3501 turtles compared with 32187 ± 2532 for the same region in November 1985. This difference between surveys was not significant when sighting conditions were taken into account. However, the agreement between the 1985 and 1990 surveys was not nearly as good for turtles as for dugongs, probably due to: (1) the sensitivity of turtle sightings to small changes in sighting conditions which cannot be completely removed in the analyses and (2) the tendency of turtles to migrate to breed coincident with the timing of the surveys. All the cetaceans sighted were dolphins. Most of the animals appeared to be bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncates, or Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins, Sousa chinensis. The population estimates for November-December 1990 sum to 4875 ± s.e. 500 dolphins for the whole region compared with 6609 ± 667 in November 1985. The difference in dolphin distribution was significantly different between the two surveys.

Notes

Contact Helene Marsh Helene.Marsh@jcu.edu.au for access to GIS data. Funding for these surveys was obtained from the following government agencies: - Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA), - Department of Environment and Resource Management (DERM), - Australian Marine Mammal Centre (AMMC), - Torres Strait Regional Authority (TSRA), - Australian Fisheries Management Authority (AFMA), - Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility (MTSRF), - National Environmental Research Program (NERP).

Created: 2011-11-24

Data time period: 31 10 1990 to 30 12 1990

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph

142.8859,-11.5 145.5632,-11.5 145.5632,-15.1252 142.8859,-15.1252 142.8859,-11.5

144.22455,-13.3126

text: Northern Great Barrier Reef

Identifiers
  • Local : 2928c88285f2066c92aa80ca3ebe7d84
  • Local : jcu.edu.au/tdh/collection/d36c4789-3b8f-4771-8fff-c3b41f8f9e12
  • Local : https://research.jcu.edu.au/data/published/1423b384b48d5c9e94cdffc095a96f6b